Wednesday round-up: OTS, Olympics, Obama

In a radical break with tradition, here’s a Wednesday round-up for you of relevant news, views and opinion.

– First up, I’ve tried to capture a fair bit of Skoll, and post-Skoll coverage: that would be a links page on its own, though, so best viewed and checked out via our Del.icio.us bookmarks link at http://del.icio.us/SSE/Skoll which encompasses a pretty decent cross-section….

– A social enterprise business park as an Olympic legacy: sounds good. And most interestingly, put forward by someone who is a practitioner, not an umbrella org looking for funds; and we used Calverts for our last big printing job (highly recommended)

When Muhammad met Liam (Yunus and Black): interesting conversation transcript

– A compare and contrast on social franchising (US- based) from Social Enterprise Reporter

CSR as a business strategy

– Decent piece on (social) entrepreneurship / government policy in HBR; incidentally, there is a piece in the current Stanford Social Innovation Review which suggests what the new US president (come on Obama!) should do in this field. More on this soon…

– Also in SSIR is a piece about the relationship between producitivity and impact in the non-profit sector; it’s called "More Bang for the Buck" which gives you an indication of where it’s coming from. I think I took more from this case study

– Big welcome to the first 4 UK Ashoka Fellows, and congrats to Ben Metz for pulling off a good event the other evening. The Fellows are Camila Batmanghelidjh, Al Harris, Bob Paterson, and Faisel Rahman.

– OTS has released a piece of research from Rocket Science on Social Enterprise Networks. I found this useful and informative, but I’m not sure if that’s only because I’m approaching sector-geek status. What the report does do, alongside give a good overview of regional and sub-regional networks, is emphasise the need for more peer-to-peer learning / networks….and wisely pulls out SSE as a case study. :0)

More soon, when the frenzy of the last few weeks calms itself…..do buy some extra reading in the meantime :0)

Share Button

Is your website mainstream?

Noted today how the School of Everything (who live upstairs from us) blogged about how they hoped to see more people browsing on their website using Internet Explorer rather than Firefox, on the basis that this would demonstrate they are going ‘mainstream’. They then compare this to the Wikipedia breakdown of the average percentages of browser use.

This seems to me an eminently successful exercise, and a useful ‘finger-in-the-air’ assessment for whether you are just reaching white 30 year-old men who like reading Clay Shirky, watching TED video podcasts and twittering or friendfeeding every waking moment. You know who you are (he said, looking in the mirror). Wonder what the breakdown would be for all web 2.0 sites?

Not really applicable in SSE’s case, as we’re hardly web 2.0 (this blog aside), but happy to report that Google’s Analytics tells me we’re pretty much bang on the Wikipedia average: 71% Explorer, 22% Firefox, 6% Safari, a bit of Opera (so to speak) and then the odds and sods. Must attract more geeks to the site…. :0)

Share Button

The Bubb enters the fray…

Just a quick note to say that Stephen Bubb, legendary CEO of ACEVO has entered the (non-profit) blogosphere, starting with a suitable low-key post with hardly a name dropped….oh, ok, maybe the odd minister or two…and the Queen. Couple of sideswipes at others, talk of a dog and we’re away.

Anyway, promises to be an interesting read, if it continues regularly and, more seriously, it’s good to have the organisation that represents leaders in the third sector showing a bit of leadership in this area……. Check it out here.

Share Button

UnLtd World: voyage of discovery?

As I mentioned recently, I attended the UnLtd World launch recently, which was held in a dingy nightclub in a road tunnel by London Bridge (if the intention was to make us feel slightly seedy / ‘underground’ on our way in, then it succeeded!). I was keen to attend, because I’ve been following its development ever since a very early meeting about the concept almost a year ago.

Certainly, in the rash of web 2.0 / third sector projects, I think it has as much chance of success as anything. Like most judgements, this is based for me on the product but, equally importantly, the person. Firstly, the site is very usable, pretty intuitive and with lots of useful features, specifically designed for use by social entrepreneurs (resources, relevant groups) or to be interesting to them (shoutbox microblogging, Q&A debates etc). It seems to be gathering momentum, although (and this is one caveat), it’s difficult to tell if you don’t add friends….(sounds like a dense point, but ways into the information other than through friends is crucial: I’m beginning to find some of these).

Generally, I feel positive about its chances, and the second reason for that is about the person leading it, Alberto Nardelli, who has insisted on its openness and usability by others from the start. Though ‘closed’ in that you have to register, it is open in terms of its structure (APIs, feeds etc) and that ethos is written through Alberto and the site like a stick of rock. I remember at the original discussion, someone said that it was not about being "King of the Hill" anymore, but building "the hill" (being it even) for others to use and interact with. Though at the moment (particularly given the name etc) it seems like more the former than the latter, I think we will see more interesting uses of this ‘hill’ moving forward. This is where it gets interesting for SSE, in that we can work with Alberto and his team to think about how we best interact with / use / pull from / feed into / re-brand the hill to our own (aka our students and Fellows’) purposes; I’m meeting him about this on his return from SXSW.

So I’m pretty positive and will hopefully have more to write about this soon. My solitary "But?" is a version of one that was rather brutally expressed in a comment on the Guardian blog’s piece on the site:

"More web 2.0 candyfloss. You could surely do more for your community by
getting up off your arse, getting out from behind the computer and just
doing a few hours community service."

Now obviously this sets up a rather unfair and untrue either/or scenario (either they’ll use UnLtdWorld, or they’ll do something in the real world), whereas most of the people signed up are already engaged in real-world projects in one way or another. But we do have to think about where resources are best expended to the furthering of social justice, of social change. I get as carried away by the new tech and geekery as anyone else, and don’t want to be Luddite, but I do think there is a rise of slacktivism and what might be called ‘hands-free philanthropy’.

This is a wider point than just UnLtdWorld. At the two most recent events I’ve been to, I’ve found out about three new web-based philanthropy / social networking / social entrepreneurship initiatives….and there is a real difference between an existing SSE Fellow or UnLtd Award-winner using these sites to further practical ends on the ground, and a whole load of well-meaning people putting shouts out to each other and debating their favourite films. Or clicking a couple of buttons and keeping a healthy distance from all that poverty and disadvantage. It must come down to impact (UnLtdWorld’s Research Lab (log in required) looks like an erstwhile attempt to pre-empt this) in the end, and the most effective way of using human and financial resources to achieve an organisation’s (or society’s) goals.

Ultimately, web 2.0 sites such as this are (incredibly powerful) tools to facilitate things to happen, for changes to be made; they are not the change themselves. At the risk of a bad extended metaphor in reference to the title of this post,  that’s what’s written at the top of my map whilst charting a course through the ever-changing, somewhat choppy waters of new technology on behalf of SSE. I hope UnLtdWorld proves a useful port of call.

Share Button

A ray of Sunlight

Ambassadors are starting to blog (hoorah), mostly with some introductory posts about who they are and what they do. Great post up today from Peter Holbrook from Sunlight Development Trust which gives a window into their world of diverse, community-based services and products. Here’s his abridged history of Sunlight’s growth and development:

"Our journey goes something like this (abridged):

1. Understand the problem and identify possible solutions
2. Build a common vision with others
3. Consult in a meaningful way – check your assumptions and revise your vision – ‘action research’  works well
4. Get money – we got ours from the lottery
5. Get more  – we got more trusts and government regeneration funding
6. Yep we’re still short – we’ll need twice as much as we thought we might need.
7. We grew our aspirations by working with partners – keep as many useful people and partners with you as possible.
8. Don’t be afraid to lose some people and partners along the way, especially if they’re nasty, unhelpful or miserable
9.
Get lovely staff, volunteers and supporters – check us out – we do have
lovely staff and volunteers – probably the best in the whole wide world.
10. We got going – doing really good stuff – check out our website.
11. Crikey people like us!  We’re getting loads of awards.  The PM is coming to visit!!
12. Yikes we’re running out of money!
13. We need more money
14. What’s all this about social enterprise?
15. We’re doing social enterprise and making some money.
16. No one is telling us what to do with our earned money – much better and more liberating than boring old grants.
17. Goodness me… we’re still here (just) and err….growing."

Such a great (and realistic) view of how these things develop (particularly points 4, 5 and 6), though it obviously underplays the impressive work that Peter and his team do to make all this happen. Good honest stuff. Read the post (and the other posts) for more, and start commenting.

Share Button